New Orleans Pelicans: Paying Lonzo Ball will create future financial problems
I really don’t think there is a basketball argument against re-signing Lonzo Ball unless you are part of one of the extremist groups who either worship or hate him.
I am not wearing a tin-foil hat, so to me, Lonzo Ball is a perfect piece to put around Zion Williamson.
The argument against it is purely financial, as re-signing Lonzo Ball to a max extension could put a strain on the Pels’ future finances.
They already have $30 million plus tied up in Brandon Ingram for four seasons after this one. Zion Williamson will be due for a massive raise in two more seasons that will likely pay him upwards of $30 million a season as well.
If Lonzo is making $20 million, that is $80 million tied up in three players, which could represent nearly 75 percent of the salary cap, depending on where it is at that point.
It is projected to be around $112 million in 2021-22 and to increase at least three percent each season, but even if it goes up by the max (10 percent), those three contracts would still represent a hefty portion of it.
The Pelicans still have Steven Adams under contract for two more seasons at $17 million per, so would have to fill out the rest of their team on a tight budget. This would mean counting on young players like Jaxson Hayes, Nickeil Alexander-Walker and Kira Lewis to produce on their rookie deals, which may not happen.
The New Orleans Pelicans have a tough decision to make, as Lonzo Ball is a guy they would love to keep but it will be difficult if they want to have a deep and competitive bench. Could they find someone cheaper who can do similar things? Possibly.
If Lonzo is still a Pelican after the trade deadline then we know the Pels at least want to take a shot at re-signing him, so stay tuned.